<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME-Zeitgeist improving!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/</link>
	<description>The geekiest ogre alive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalen</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>project doing well ?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://women.shoes54.com/cat1/Ed-Hardy-for-women.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ed Hardy for women&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>project doing well ?</p>
<p><a href="http://women.shoes54.com/cat1/Ed-Hardy-for-women.html" rel="nofollow">Ed Hardy for women</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pollycoke :) &#187; Ottime notizie: Zeitgeist/Mayanna resta in Python!</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>pollycoke :) &#187; Ottime notizie: Zeitgeist/Mayanna resta in Python!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>[...] “GNOME-Zeitgeist porting ridicule&#8220;). La notizia viene direttamente da Seif Lotfy, che ha commentato con un inequivocabile: &#8220;We decided to stay with Python!&#8220;. Decisione saggia e a quanto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “GNOME-Zeitgeist porting ridicule&#8220;). La notizia viene direttamente da Seif Lotfy, che ha commentato con un inequivocabile: &#8220;We decided to stay with Python!&#8220;. Decisione saggia e a quanto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dejan</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dejan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>How is this project going? I agree with the posters who told you to use Vala.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this project going? I agree with the posters who told you to use Vala.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vexorian</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Vexorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>Mono fans? Wanting SPEED? hahahahaha...

Sugar is completely built on python, nevertheless the computers are very light on CPU cycles, and kids behind an OLPC just enjoy it... I&#039;ve seen kids try it and never did anyone notice any python &#039;slowness&#039;. Besides, Mono itself is not exactly the holy grail of speed. I think it is rather funny Mono fans would go berserk whenever you suggest a project to make a port out of MS technology... yet they are the first ones to attack python...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mono fans? Wanting SPEED? hahahahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>Sugar is completely built on python, nevertheless the computers are very light on CPU cycles, and kids behind an OLPC just enjoy it&#8230; I&#8217;ve seen kids try it and never did anyone notice any python &#8216;slowness&#8217;. Besides, Mono itself is not exactly the holy grail of speed. I think it is rather funny Mono fans would go berserk whenever you suggest a project to make a port out of MS technology&#8230; yet they are the first ones to attack python&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerseller</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>beerseller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>Personally, I am behind Vala. There is no need to use Mono in one of the key components. And so many swears that gnome pulls a whole bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I am behind Vala. There is no need to use Mono in one of the key components. And so many swears that gnome pulls a whole bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatR</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>PatR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2393&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Angry Anonymous&lt;/a&gt; 
Yah sure, c or c++ is way faster starting up, and I see this beeing important. I just wanted to give some reason not to port to mono =]. If porting, then c, c++, vala. Or if you want absolute speed then fortran 77 =]

Greetings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2393" rel="nofollow">@Angry Anonymous</a><br />
Yah sure, c or c++ is way faster starting up, and I see this beeing important. I just wanted to give some reason not to port to mono =]. If porting, then c, c++, vala. Or if you want absolute speed then fortran 77 =]</p>
<p>Greetings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seif Lotfy</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>Seif Lotfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>#gnome-shell and #gnome-zeitgeist on irc.gnome.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#gnome-shell and #gnome-zeitgeist on irc.gnome.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2394&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Seif Lotfy&lt;/a&gt; 
I&#039;m looking for the gnome-shell irc or something to put the verbiage on them. They need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2394" rel="nofollow">@Seif Lotfy</a><br />
I&#8217;m looking for the gnome-shell irc or something to put the verbiage on them. They need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seif Lotfy</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Seif Lotfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2388&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Angry Anonymous&lt;/a&gt; 
Again I never intended it to replace anything. I actually want to write a plugin for nautilus. But I guess you are here just to critisize everything. You are entitled to your opinion. But instead of being so picky I would suggest you hack up something else that you think could improve GNOME. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2388" rel="nofollow">@Angry Anonymous</a><br />
Again I never intended it to replace anything. I actually want to write a plugin for nautilus. But I guess you are here just to critisize everything. You are entitled to your opinion. But instead of being so picky I would suggest you hack up something else that you think could improve GNOME. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/03/gnome-zeitgeist-improving/comment-page-2/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seilo.geekyogre.com/?p=573#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>&gt; By the way, just in case you didnt hear it: Google plans to bring a 
&gt; python JIT by the end of 2009, based on LLVM, targeted to be 5-10 times 
&gt; faster than CPhython

I think you are adult enough to trust to tales? Similar thing already have been done for the python: psyco. It was faster about 5 to 10 times as well. But while intensive computations with large amount of data it was as slow as CPython and was about 200 times slow than pure C or C++. So it would be about 20 times slower than C (I think it would suck even more). But the point is with JIT program startup is getting worse. Python now starts quite slow. But with JIT it would start even slower. Keep in mind: startup is one of the most significant things in desktop applications expirience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; By the way, just in case you didnt hear it: Google plans to bring a<br />
&gt; python JIT by the end of 2009, based on LLVM, targeted to be 5-10 times<br />
&gt; faster than CPhython</p>
<p>I think you are adult enough to trust to tales? Similar thing already have been done for the python: psyco. It was faster about 5 to 10 times as well. But while intensive computations with large amount of data it was as slow as CPython and was about 200 times slow than pure C or C++. So it would be about 20 times slower than C (I think it would suck even more). But the point is with JIT program startup is getting worse. Python now starts quite slow. But with JIT it would start even slower. Keep in mind: startup is one of the most significant things in desktop applications expirience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

